<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>occasionally useful &#187; destructor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.maxaller.name/tag/destructor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.maxaller.name</link>
	<description>ruby, ubuntu, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Destructors in Ruby?  Not quite&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.maxaller.name/2009/12/destructors-in-ruby-not-quite/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.maxaller.name/2009/12/destructors-in-ruby-not-quite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[destructor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.maxaller.name/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was curious to see how destructors work in Ruby, and...they don't. Or rather, the method we do have, ObjectSpace.define_finalizer, is rather restrictive. But it does leave a loophole -- the callback method receives an object_id. If you're thinking this is a bad idea, you might be right -- this is just a proof [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.maxaller.name/2009/12/destructors-in-ruby-not-quite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

